Friday, February 17, 2023

While all the poets in "War is Kind", "Dulce et decorum" and "The Charge of the Light Brigade"make war their main theme, their attitude to war varies. Do you agree?

 


There are two premises in the question:

·       The main theme of all three poems is war

·       The poets’ attitude to war varies

With regard to the above, I agree with the statement that the three poems - “War is Kind” by Stephan Crane, “Dulce et Decorum” by Wilfred Owen and “The Charge of the Light Brigade” by Alfred, Lord Tennyson – deal with war as their main theme and that the attitudes the poets display towards the theme vary. While Crane and Owen considered war evil, Tennyson offers war as an opportunity for men to show their heroic spirit. In this essay, I would be looking at how the tree poets deal with the theme war and how their attitudes differ from one another.

Stephan Crane in his poem “War is Kind” deals with the suffering of both the soldiers and civilians.  In the first stanza of the poem, he shows how a cavalryman, shot at, falls off his horse and the horse runs off without him. The victims of this incident are the soldier and a young woman, probably his fiancée. In the third stanza, the poet takes the reader to the trenches of the First and the Second World Wars. The soldier the poet is focusing on dies probably from a gas attack. The victims are the soldier and his child. In the fifth stanza the poet takes the reader to the funeral of a soldier. Many of the soldiers who die in the battlefield are buried in their uniforms in mass graves without any ceremony. The family would not even get to see their bodies. Here, the poet shows us the body of such a soldier and his mother who has been made destitute by his death. According to Crane, wars are waged by “[l]ittle souls who thirst for fight” and they “drill and die” with little ceremony. However, the little souls do not arrive at the conclusion that war was the only option on their own. They have been shown “the virtue of slaughter” and “the excellence of killing” by those in power. The implication is that, people with great souls do not see wars as a way to settle disputes.    

In “Dulce et Decorum”, Wilfred Owen shows the horrors of war from the point of view of a participant. Owen was an officer of the British Army in the WW I and died during the last days of the battle. In his poem Owen shows the agony of a soldier subjected to a gas attack as well as the horror and guilt experienced by his comrades who escaped his fate. Unlike Crane who keeps his descriptions of the battle field and the situation of the soldiers to the bare minimum, Owen gives us a graphic picture of what he had surely witnessed:

Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,

Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,

Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs,

And towards our distant rest began to trudge.

Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots,

But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;  

 

The tragic death of his fellow soldier leaves such a lasting effect on the poetic persona, he has nightmares long after the incident: “In all my dreams before my helpless sight,/He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.” Similar to Crane, Owen, too, believed that the soldiers were mere pawns in a power game. They had been taught that it was sweet and decorous to die for their fatherland by those who had sent them to the battle field. 

Lord Tennyson, in his poem “The Charge of the Light Brigade” describes the heroic charge made by a group of 600 cavalrymen during the Crimean war in the late 1800s. In the poem, the poet glorifies the discipline of the soldiers and their commitment to their task. He commends their heroism in following the command even knowing all of them were going to die were they to obey that command:

    Not tho’ the soldier knew
Some one had blunder’d:
Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die:

He is critical of the short-sightedness of the commanders who risked the lives of the soldiers similar to the other two poets. However, he is not critical of war itself or of choosing the life of a soldier. In contrast, he urges the entire world to respect the soldiers who died upholding the heroic code when he says:

When can their glory fade?
O the wild charge they made!
All the world wonder’d.
Honor the charge they made!
Honor the Light Brigade,
Noble six hundred!

In conclusion, yes, all three poems deal with war as the main theme of the poems. However, while Crane and Owen look at war as an evil that is promoted by the power hungry people who have very little regard for the lives of the soldiers who die terrible deaths on the battlefield or their loved ones who would suffer because of their deaths or the soldiers who survived the actual war but would be forever marked by their terrible battlefield memories, Lord Tennyson glorifies war as an occasion where soldier get to show their heroic spirit.  


Tuesday, February 14, 2023

"Shakespeare plays with us throughout Othello, exploiting stereotypes, arousing expectations, alternatively fulfilling and frustrating preconceptions ... I think this play is racist, and I think it is not." Do you agree with this statement on Shakespeare's Othello?

 




I firmly believe that William Shakespeare in Othello plays with his audience by exploiting stereotypes, arousing expectations which he alternatively fulfils and frustrates. In my answer I would be looking at how Shakespeare had played with his audience by exploiting stereotypes, arousing our expectations, fulfilling our biases only to frustrate us in the next breath. In conclusion I would briefly look at to what end the playwright does that.

Looking at the stereotypes employed by the playwright, black vs. white, European vs. Non-European, Christian vs. pagan, and civilized Renaissance world vs. Cyprus and the world of the barbarians. Through the way the playwright handles these binaries one gets the idea that Shakespeare supports one or the other at different times in the course of the play. When one looks at the way he handles binaries such as black vs. white, European vs. non-European, Christian vs. Pagan and the civilized Renaissance Venice vs. Cyprus and other places occupied by the “Turks,” one gets the impression that at a certain point the playwright is racist only to be immediately corrected. It must be kept in mind that being a tragedy, Othello is the tragic hero of the play. By making a non-European newly converted black man the tragic hero of his play which is subtitled the Moor of Venice, Shakespeare announces his bias towards Othello. By virtue of being the tragic hero, Othello is a great man. Despite his greatness he has a tragic flaw that causes his down fall. However, a tragedy requires a tragic hero to recognize his flaw and reverse his course. This happens in Othello as well. Consequently, Othello who dies following the tragic conventions dies a restored hero.    

In Act I Roderigo, Iago and Brabantiao describe Othello in a deprecating manner. According to them his colour seems to predispose him to pride, irrationality, practice of witch craft and sexual promiscuity. However, Othello whom we meet dashes all such allegations through the very nobility of his words bearing and actions: “”.  He appears the very embodiment of reason and dignity, a fitting mate to Desdemona, a flower of Venetian womanhood despite the differences in “years, of country, credit and everything”.  It is from this height Othello descends to the very depth of irrationality and shame as a result of his overweening sense of selfhood and the resulting jealousy. Once he gives into his internal demons, he becomes epileptic, uses indecent language to address his bride, strikes her in front of her countrymen and relatives, spies on his wife, questions female servants, and plots murder. But even at this point the playwright is careful to hint at his simplicity of spirit and his inner torment which go a long way to justify what he does.  When he realizes he was wrong, Othello was more sever on himself than he was on his victims. Shakespeare allows Othello a beautiful parting speech before he kills the “Turk” in himself.

The characters that act as foils for Othello are people like Roderigo, Iago, Brabantio and Cassio. Shakespeare presents Roderigo, a Venetian as a weak immoral character who is easily gulled by Iago. Brabantio was someone who is equal in stature to the Duke of Venice, but he despite his age and social standing has to be cautioned to act with dignity and reason by Othello. Looking at Iago, he is a good soldier, witty, smart and intelligent – he has all the qualities that should have elevated him to the status of a Renaissance man and a hero. However, irrational vendetta and amorality makes him no better than a beast and he is going to die a beastly death.  It is his punishment for corrupting the simple trusting soul of Othello and causing so much pain and death. Lastly, Cassio, is a mathematician and a ladies’ man. He is handsome and articulate. His manners are impeccable. Still, he considers Othello to be superior to him and acts as a go-between in the early stages of Othello’s relationship with Desdemona. In addition, he has a character flaw: he is unable to hold his liqueur. He has a weak will that can be influenced by someone like Iago just like Othello. In Othello’s case that could be excused due to his upbringing. Cassio does not have that excuse.  Once intoxicated Cassio behave irrationally and threatens social stability. Othello had to intervene to restore order.

In the play, Shakespeare seems to suggest Venice to be the seat of reason, good governance and civilized behaviour. In contrast, the world from which Othello comes is populated by pirates, Anthropophagi, cannibals, sibyls and handkerchiefs charmed with maiden blood. Both Othello and the Turks are from outside the civilization as the West knew it – no rules, no institutions – Othello takes the law into his own hands, the success of a marriage depended on witch craft. However, both Othello and the Turks are identifiable threats that could be easily defused because they are upfront about their intentions.  Cypress is an in between space. Initial observations may point to Shakespeare privileging Venice/ Europe over the non-European world as well as the in between space symbolized by Cypress. But a close analysis shows that true evil stems from Venice in the form of Iago and Roderigo  and corrupts the noble savage in Othello.

Cypress may be an in between place with budding institutions that need careful nurturing as Othello had pointed out in relation to Cassio’s fight with Roderigo.                               

In conclusion, there is no doubt that Shakespeare makes use of stereotypes in order to arouse his audience’s expectations which he alternatively fulfils and frustrates.

In my view, Shakespeare uses this technique in order to keep his audience engaged in the plot. The audience cannot miss a word or take a character for granted – the characters are dynamic and rounded as s result of constantly challenging stereotypes. By frustrating the audiences’ expectations the playwright adds depth to the plot of his play. 



Othello - Is Iago the most important character in the play?

 


The character of Iago can be analysed for his excellence in manipulating others in order to accomplish his evil motives. In that sense, he is the most important character that made all the other characters victims in his scheme in the tragedy Othello.  Do you agree?

According to my reading, there are three premises in the question:

·       Iago is good at manipulating others in order to accomplish his evil motives.

·       This makes him the most important character.

·       In his capacity as the most important character Iago makes all the other characters victims in his scheme.

Based on my reading of the text, while I agree with the take that Iago is quite good at manipulating others in order to accomplish his aims which make him the prime mover of the plot, I do not believe that he is the most important character in the play. The reason for my belief that Iago is not the most important character lies mostly in the title. The drama is named after the protagonist Othello in the drama, Iago being just the antagonist. The dramatist makes the story of the play a story about Othello. An antagonist, in such a situation, is a tragic convention who makes use of the existing tragic flaw of the protagonist enabling the fall of the protagonist. Thereby, a great man like Othello needs a worthy adversary to bring about his fall. Had Iago been anything less than what he was that would adversely affect the heroic stature of the hero, making him “an every-man's dummy”. Consequently, the complexity and the intelligence of the antagonist in Othello is a tribute to the protagonist of the play. Simply said, Iago offers a foil for the simple heroic grandeur of the protagonist and heightens the pathos and thereby increases the cathartic effect felt by the audience; however, he does not create the tragic flaws in Othello, Desdemona, Cassio or any other character. Iago is a clever opportunist who makes use of what is available. However, whenever Iago plots to destroy Othello, the protagonist rises to the occasion due his heroic qualities - his conviction in his arête and kleos, his simplicity, his appreciation of beauty and his belief in justice and morality. Consequently, the pathos and the subsequent catharsis generated by the play results from Othello’s fall; therefore, the eponymous hero Othello is the most important character in the play. While Iago is necessary for the fall of the hero, the play is not about the fall of Iago: Iago even at the beginning of the play is a fallen creature in all possible sense of the term.

Let us look at how Shakespeare makes use of the character of Iago to bring about the fall of Othello (peripateia), the subsequent understanding of his tragic flaw (anagnorisis) and the resulting restoration of his heroic stature at the end of the play. Othello, following the tragic convention, is a larger than life figure with a purely linear way of thinking as indicated by the way he deals with Brabantio’s accusations and threats and his speech at the Senate (eg). All tragic heroes have a tragic flaw and Othello’s is his obsession of his sense of arête (excellence) and kleos (renown). Othello does not have a family or property due to his life of soldiering; therefore, his entire wealth is limited to kleos and arête he had earned by performing soldierly feats. Understandably, he considers any threat to his kleos and arête as threat to his very being. Iago hints at his awareness of Othello’s thinking when he complains to the audience of Othello’s pride in rejecting his suit for lieutenancy. The Venetian society seconds his sense of “self”: Othello becomes the general of the Venetian army, earns repeated invitations to the house of the most powerful man of Venice, wins Desdemona and is appointed as the governor of Cyprus based on nothing but arête and kleos conveyed by the story of his heroic adventures; all the characters including Othello himself agree that Othello’s exterior would frighten Venetians and that his race, age and socioeconomic circumstances would stand against him should he attempt to make a place for himself in the Venetian society. It is in this light that Iago’s actions must be viewed: Iago makes use of Othello’s Achilles’ Heel – his pride in his arête and kleos – by suggesting that the woman he won with his story had got tired of him even before their marriage was consummated and turned to a man of her own “nature,/Of years, of country, credit, every thing” and thereby set the chain of tragic events in motion.                        

In his capacity as the antagonist, Iago’s enmity towards Othello stems mainly from Othello’s refusal to give him the post of his lieutenant Othello had given to Cassio, who like Othello is an outsider to Venice. Iago considers Cassio as an entirely unsuitable person for the post and his appointment as a personal insult to himself. Iago also mentions that Othello may have slept with his wife Emilia – this with little to no evidence. Irrespective of his sense of being wronged, Iago has the sense to know that he is unable take revenge from Othello given the disparity of their status – he was the lowly ancient to the great general who he himself has acknowledged as the only man who could save Venice, the seat of reason, from the irrational barbaric forces represented by the Ottomites. However, an event presents itself in the form of Desdemona’s elopement and her subsequent hasty marriage to the tragic hero. Iago makes use of Rodrigo, one of the curled darlings of Venice Desdemona has rejected, in order to set Desdemona’s father whose word has double the weight of that of the Duke of Venice due to his great wealth after the Othello. The charge is mixing of races using witch craft, an offence that would have cost Othello his life under normal circumstances. However, to Iago’s displeasure his plan does not work. Instead of bringing about Othello’s disgrace and demise, the event highlights Othello’s necessity for the well-being of Venice and reinforces his role as the protagonist and the tragic hero. Unperturbed, Iago set out to create a rift between Othello and Cassio. This of course, we know, does not work as Othello himself tells Desdemona that he would reinstate Cassio in due course. The way Othello handles the perilous situation involving the drunken Cassio highlights his quick thinking and leadership qualities as well as his judgement of people.

Next, Iago tries to poison Othello against Cassio and his wife making use of his ignorance of the Venetian customs and his underlying insecurity as the outsider (the Other). Here, despite his insecurity, Othello insists on seeing evidence before taking action in contrast to Iago who in similar circumstances would not hesitate to destroy a man without any evidence at all. Several times Othello attempts to brush aside the suspicions planted in his mind by Iago when confronted by the simple truth of Desdemona’s evident devotion and love for him which makes the audience think positively of the judgement of the hero. It takes all of Iago’s evil genius to finally convince Othello that Desdemona had sinned against not only her marriage vows but also god himself by committing adultery. It must be noted that Shakespeare’s patron Queen Elizabeth’s own father had beheaded three of his six wives for committing adultery. So, in killing Desdemona Othello is exercising his agency as the head of the family (paterfamilias) who enacts laws of the state and religion within the family. The Duke acknowledges this privilege accorded to the paterfamilias when he invites Desdemona’s father to give the punishment he deemed suitable for Desdemona’s abduction in the first act. In this regard, even at his worst, Othello, unlike Iago, is conscious of beauty and refuses to harm Desdemona’s beauty; thus, instead of strangling or beheading her, Othello chooses to suffocate Desdemona. Iago, on the other hand, murders his wife Emilia brutally without any feeling of contrition to save his own neck.

In the end, Othello realizes his fault, repents and kills the Turk in him, so that the essence of Othello would remain untainted and heroic. Shakespeare allows one of the most poignant speeches in the play to Othello just before his suicide. The Venetian dignitaries recall his former glory in their references to Othello after his death (eg). Iago, on the other hand, is shut up – he says he would not speak any more. In spite of his declaration of his heroism in the initial act, Iago runs away and then is brought back ignominiously and sentenced to prolonged torture.

Hence, it is clear that Iago, with all his complexities, is there in the play to highlight the character of the tragic hero Othello. True that it is Iago’s actions drives the events of the plot, but his evil genius instead of making him the most important character of the play offers a foil that limelights the heroic stature of Othello, and to an extent Desdemona and Cassio. Consequently, Iago is a merely tool Shakespeare had used to underscore the tragic grandeur of Othello, the most important character of the play.


                     

 

Rape of the Lock - Canto 3 - Alexander Pope (Revised note - 2023)

 


The Rape of the Lock[M1] 

Biography - Alexander Pope

Alexander Pope was born in London in 1688. As a Roman Catholic living during a time of Protestant consolidation in England, he was largely excluded from the university system and from political life, and suffered certain social and economic disadvantages because of his religion as well. He was self-taught to a great extent, and was an assiduous scholar from a very early age. He learned several languages on his own, and his early verses were often imitations of poets he admired. His obvious talent found encouragement from his father, a linen-draper, as well as from literary-minded friends. At the age of twelve, Pope contracted a form of tuberculosis that settled in his spine, leaving him stunted and misshapen and causing him great pain for much of his life. He never married, though he formed a number of lifelong friendships in London’s literary circles, most notably with Jonathan Swift[M2] .

Pope wrote during what is often called the Augustan/ Restoration/ Neoclassical Age of English literature (indeed, it is Pope’s career privileging satire defines the age). During this time, the nation had recovered from the English Civil Wars and the Glorious Revolution, and the regained sense of political stability led to a resurgence of support for the arts. For this reason, many compared the period to the reign of Augustus Caesar in the 1st century AD Rome, under whom both Virgil and Horace had found support for their work. The prevailing taste of the day was neoclassical, and 18th-century English writers tended to value poetry that was learned and allusive, setting less value on originality than the Romantics would in the next century. This literature also tended to be morally and often politically engaged, as its dominant mode.

The Rape of the Lock is one of the most famous English-language examples of the mock-epic. Published in its first version in 1712, when Pope was only 23 years old, the poem served to forge his reputation as a poet and remains his most frequently studied work. The inspiration for the poem was an actual incident among Pope’s acquaintances in which Robert, Lord Petre, cut off a lock of Arabella Fermor’s hair, and the young people’s families fell into strife as a result. John Caryll, another member of this same circle of prominent Roman Catholics, asked Pope to write a light poem that would put the episode into a humorous perspective and reconcile the two families. The poem was originally published in a shorter version, which Pope later revised. In this later version he added the “machinery,” the retinue of supernaturals who influence the action as well as the moral of the tale.

After the publication of The Rape of the Lock, Pope spent many years translating the works of Homer. During the ten years he devoted to this arduous project, he produced very few new poems of his own but refined his taste in literature (and his moral, social, and political opinions) to an incredible degree. When he later recommenced to write original poetry, Pope struck a more serious tone than the one he gave to The Rape of the Lock. These later poems are more severe in their moral judgments and more acidic in their satire: Pope’s Essay on Man is a philosophical poem on metaphysics, ethics, and human nature, while in the Dunciad Pope writes a scathing exposé of the bad writers and pseudo-intellectuals of his day.

 

Characters

·       Belinda - Belinda is based on the historical Arabella Fermor, a member of Pope’s circle of prominent Roman Catholics. Robert, Lord Petre (the Baron in the poem) had precipitated a rift between their two families by snipping off a lock of her hair.

·       The Baron -  This is the pseudonym for the historical Robert, Lord Petre, the young gentleman in Pope’s social circle who offended Arabella Fermor and her family by cutting off a lock of her hair. In the poem’s version of events, Arabella is known as Belinda.

·       Clarissa -  A woman in attendance at the Hampton Court party. She lends the Baron the pair of scissors with which he cuts Belinda’s hair

·       Ariel -  Belinda’s guardian sylph, who oversees an army of invisible protective deities

·       Brillante -  The sylph who is assigned to guard Belinda’s earrings

·       Crispissa -  The sylph who is assigned to guard Belinda’s “fav’rite Lock”

Summary of the poem

In the section before the given extract Belinda arises to prepare for the day’s social activities after sleeping late. Her guardian sylph, Ariel, warned her in a dream that some disaster will befall her, and promises to protect her to the best of his abilities. Belinda takes little notice of this oracle, however. After an elaborate ritual of dressing and primping, she travels on the Thames River to Hampton Court Palace, an ancient royal residence outside of London, where a group of wealthy young socialites are gathering for a party. Among them is the Baron, who has already made up his mind to steal a lock of Belinda’s hair. He has risen early to perform an elaborate set of prayers and sacrifices to promote success in this enterprise.

In the section given for the appraisal of the AL candidates the partygoers are seen enjoying a tense game of cards after their arrival at the palace. Thereafter they enjoy a round of coffee. The curling vapours of the steaming coffee remind the Baron of his intention to attempt Belinda’s lock. Clarissa draws out her scissors for his use, as a lady would arm a knight in a romance. Taking up the scissors, he tries three times to clip the lock from behind without Belinda seeing. The Sylphs endeavour furiously to intervene, blowing the hair out of harm’s way and tweaking her diamond earring to make her turn around. Ariel, in a last-minute effort, gains access to her mind, where he is surprised to find “an earthly lover lurking at her heart.” He gives up protecting her then; the implication is that she secretly wants the Baron. Finally, the scissors  close on the curl. A daring sylph (Crispisa) jumps in between the blades and is cut in two; but being a supernatural creature, he is quickly restored. The deed is done, and the Baron exults while Belinda’s screams fill the air.

In the subsequent section, Umbriel, a mischievous gnome, journeys down to the Cave of Spleen to procure a sack of sighs and a flask of tears which he then bestows on the heroine to fan the flames of her ire. Clarissa, who had aided the Baron in his crime, now urges Belinda to give up her anger in favor of good humor and good sense, moral qualities which will outlast her vanities. But Clarissa’s moralizing falls on deaf ears, and Belinda initiates a scuffle between the ladies and the gentlemen, in which she attempts to recover the severed curl. The lock is lost in the confusion of this mock battle, however; the poet consoles the bereft Belinda with the suggestion that it has been taken up into the heavens and immortalized as a constellation.

Extract of Canto 3

But when to mischief mortals bend their will,

How soon they find fit instruments of ill!

Just then, Clarissa drew with tempting grace

A two-edg'd weapon from her shining case;

So ladies in romance assist their knight

Present the spear, and arm him for the fight.

He takes the gift with rev'rence, and extends

The little engine on his fingers' ends;[M3] 

This just behind Belinda's neck he spread,

As o'er the fragrant steams she bends her head.

Swift to the lock a thousand sprites repair,

A thousand wings, by turns, blow back the hair,

And thrice they twitch'd the diamond in her ear,

Thrice she look'd back, and thrice the foe drew near.

Just in that instant, anxious Ariel sought

The close recesses of the virgin's thought;

As on the nosegay in her breast reclin'd,

He watch'd th' ideas rising in her mind,

Sudden he view'd, in spite of all her art,

An earthly lover lurking at her heart.

Amaz'd, confus'd, he found his pow'r expir'd,

Resign'd to fate, and with a sigh retir'd.

 

The peer now spreads the glitt'ring forfex wide,

T' inclose the lock; now joins it, to divide.

Ev'n then, before the fatal engine clos'd,

A wretched Sylph too fondly interpos'd;

Fate urg'd the shears, and cut the Sylph in twain,

(But airy substance soon unites again).

The meeting points the sacred hair dissever

From the fair head, for ever, and for ever!

 

 Then flash'd the living lightning from her eyes,

And screams of horror rend th' affrighted skies.

Not louder shrieks to pitying Heav'n are cast,

When husbands or when lap-dogs breathe their last,

Or when rich China vessels, fall'n from high,

In glitt'ring dust and painted fragments lie!

 

Epic – characteristics  

·       The word “epic” comes from the Ancient Greek word epos, which simply means “word, narrative, or song”.

1.     It starts with the theme or subject of the story.

2.     In epics, the bard invokes a Muse, one of the nine daughters of Zeus. The poet prays to the Muses to provide divine inspiration to tell the great story.

3.     An epic poem is a lengthy, narrative work of poetry.

4.     These long poems typically detail extraordinary feats and adventures of characters from a distant past. 

5.     It is written in a very special style (verse as opposed to prose).

6.     The narrative opens in medias res, or in the middle of things, usually with the hero at his lowest point. Usually flashbacks show earlier portions of the story.

7.     It presents the heroic ideals such as courage, honour, sacrifice, patriotism and kindness.

8.     An epic gives a clear window of the social and cultural patterns of the contemporary life. Beowulf thus shows the love of wine, wild celebration, war, adventure and sea-voyages.

9.     The hero is outstanding. He might be important, and historically or legendarily significant.

10.  The setting is large. It covers many nations, or the known world.

11.  The action is made of deeds of great valour or requiring superhuman courage.

12.  Supernatural forces—gods, angels, demons—insert themselves in the action.

13.  The poet tries to remain objective.

14.  Epic poems are believed to be supernatural and real

15.  Catalogues and genealogies are given. These long lists of objects, places, and people place the finite action of the epic within a broader, universal context. Often, the poet is also paying homage to the ancestors of audience members.

16.  Main characters give extended formal speeches.

17.  Use of the epic simile.

18.  Heavy use of repetition or stock phrases.

Mock epic Form

 

·       In a mock-epic the central concerns are serious and often moral, but the approach is satirical rather than earnest indicating how far the culture has fallen.

·       The epic considered the most serious of literary forms, had been applied to the lofty subject matter of love, war and faith.

·       Pope uses the form to mock his society in its very failure to rise to epic standards, exposing its pettiness by casting it against the grandeur of the traditional epic subjects and the bravery and fortitude of epic heroes

·       Pope underscores the ridiculousness of a society that fails to distinguish between things that matter and things that do not – it has lost its sense of proportion. The trivial is handled with the gravity and solemnity that ought to be accorded to truly important issues

·       The poem mocks the men it portrays by showing them as unworthy of a form that suited a more heroic culture.

·       He intended the poem to be cathartic.  

·       Pope’s use of the mock-epic genre is intricate and exhaustive.

·       Every element of the contemporary scene conjures up some image from epic tradition or the classical world view

·       The great battles of epic become bouts of gambling and flirtatious tiffs.

·       The great, if capricious, Greek and Roman gods are converted into a relatively undifferentiated army of basically ineffectual sprites.

·       Cosmetics, clothing, and jewelry substitute for armor and weapons, and the rituals of religious sacrifice are transplanted to the dressing room and the altar of love.

Themes

1.     Deterioration of heroic ideals (kleos/ arête) is the central theme of the poem - parodying of great classical epics reflects the fall in stature of Pope’s society and the deterioration of its values. All other themes are subthemes of this particular theme

a.      Man’s place in the Universe - Pope discusses man’s relationship with God,
fellow human beings and himself: the fundamental ethic of man’s existence.

                                          i.     Reversal of Gender roles - 18th Century society in England expected certain stereotypes – women to be modest and men to be masculine. But in the poem both Belinda and Clarissa are strong, dominant women. The men in the poem are effeminate. Baron is a fop and show off. He needs a woman – Clarissa to empower him.

                                        ii.     Female sexuality - Women were expected to be modest and retain high moral values. A woman who transgresses is sidelined and ostracized. The word ‘rape’ is significant in the poem. Belinda’s wantonness in habouring an earthly man in her heart earns her the ‘rape’ of her lock and the consequent rage and shame.

b.     Idleness, vanity and excess of the upper class resulting in an amoral society –

                                          i.     Beauty is worshipped at the expense of strength of character and good name

                                        ii.     The ruling classes are involved in very superficial, unimportant activities -Baron’s enjoyment derived from clipping Belinda’s hair is a sign of the depravity the upper class had sunk to.

                                      iii.     The characters are uncontrolled and undisciplined. Pope as a product of an age that privileged reason over emotional excess illustrates what happens when vanity and passion are left unchecked.

Techniques:

·       Mock epic genre - Pope uses the mock epic to create high burlesque. He mocks the subject matter (event and characters) by treating it with a dignity it does not deserve

·       The heroic couplet - The verse form of The Rape of the Lock is the heroic couplet - lines of ten syllables each, alternating stressed and unstressed syllables.

o   Pope distributes his sentences, with their resolutely parallel grammar, across the lines and half-lines of the poem in a way that enhances the judicious quality of his ideas.

o   The inherent balance of the couplet form is strikingly well suited to a subject matter that draws on comparisons and contrasts: the form invites configurations in which two ideas or circumstances are balanced, measured, or compared against one another.

o   It is thus perfect for the evaluative, moralizing premise of the poem, particularly in the hands of this brilliant poet.

·       Zeugma, a rhetorical device in which a word or phrase modifies two other words or phrases in a parallel construction, but modifies each in a different way or according to a different sense. The reader is asked to contemplate that paradox and to reflect on the relative value and importance of these two different registers of activity - lines 1578: “Not louder shrieks to pitying heaven are cast, / when husbands, or when lapdogs breathe their last.”

·       Parody – Pope parodies the battle scenes of the great epic poems - in the image of Clarissa arming the Baron—not with a real weapon, however, but with a pair of sewing scissors - Pope is suggesting that the energy and passion once applied to brave and serious purposes is now expended on such insignificant trials as games and gambling, which often become a mere front for flirtation.

·       Rule of three - “the three attempts” by which the lock is cut is a convention of heroic challenges, particularly in the romance genre.

·       Irony - the ironic comparison of the Baron’s feat to the conquest of nations.




 [M1]A sensational title

 [M2]Gulliver’s Travels 2nd Book does the same thing Pope does here

 [M3]Suggestive language

A discussion on මතක මග මගහැර by Sandya Kumudini Liyanage

By Anupama Godakanda                                 anupamagodakanda@gmail.com